 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bergmann 1894"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Going further, shouldn't all this be finally merged with [[Bergmann-Bayard]]? --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 13:08, 20 November 2019 (EST) | ::Going further, shouldn't all this be finally merged with [[Bergmann-Bayard]]? --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 13:08, 20 November 2019 (EST) | ||
:::Not really; the Bayards were a fairly distinct series. I suppose we could just merge it all under a generic "Bergmann Pistols" page or something. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 16:24, 20 November 2019 (EST) | :::Not really; the Bayards were a fairly distinct series. I suppose we could just merge it all under a generic "Bergmann Pistols" page or something. [[User:Pyr0m4n14c|Pyr0m4n14c]] ([[User talk:Pyr0m4n14c|talk]]) 16:24, 20 November 2019 (EST) | ||
| − | :::: The Bayards are better | + | :::: The Bayards are better off left in their own page. --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 19:23, 20 November 2019 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 00:23, 21 November 2019
I suspect again it is better to merge this with Bergmann 1896. Especially considering that there used is not even a real one. --Slon95 (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2019 (EST)
- Yes, it makes sense as both 1894 and 1896 models had same blowback action, and M94 was produced only in prototypes. --Greg-Z (talk) 13:41, 18 November 2019 (EST)
- Going further, shouldn't all this be finally merged with Bergmann-Bayard? --Slon95 (talk) 13:08, 20 November 2019 (EST)
- Not really; the Bayards were a fairly distinct series. I suppose we could just merge it all under a generic "Bergmann Pistols" page or something. Pyr0m4n14c (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2019 (EST)
- Going further, shouldn't all this be finally merged with Bergmann-Bayard? --Slon95 (talk) 13:08, 20 November 2019 (EST)