Talk:The Green Hornet (2011)

Desert Eagle is a Non-Gun

I changed the Desert Eagle section to say "Non-Gun Replica" b/c if you look at the picture it looks completely fake. -Ranger01 18:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

It's also double-barreled, as evident here: http://moviesmedia.ign.com/movies/image/article/110/1100423/the-green-hornet-20100621095752871.jpg --Lord Mo 00:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok, that's weird... I thought that was just a reflection.-Ranger01 04:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

I think that was active denial on your part. --Lord Mo 14:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

In the pic it does look like a reflection, but the barrels are actually between the window frame, the reflection is below it.

Just thinking about this movie in general makes my head hurt, but that... double-barreled Desert Eagle (man was that hard to type) just makes everything that much worse. Atypicaloracle

I would ask how that's even supposed to work, but something tells me I don't want to know.--PistolJunkie 21:53, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

...probably would work the same as a double barreled shotgun-brendan r.-

*Sigh* it's a magazine-fed automatic. Think for a moment.--PistolJunkie 03:07, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

....i mean it would have two separate triggers and you could fire one or two bullets at a time

No but how would it feed, please think about it. Two barrels, one magazine. Do you understand how magazine fed weaponary works? --Captain Snikt 12:56, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

It's like they said "hey, what if we made a gun that worked like a Neosetead in reverse!" I know that movies tend to disregard physics via Rule Of Cool, but this is just nauseating.--PistolJunkie 19:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

The only way it would work relatively easily would be single loaded barrels like the Thompson Contender. Then a two stage trigger and Ta-Dah! Instant cool and useless gun! :) MoviePropMaster2008

Harr! Harr! Cant you guys see its an ilusion? The guns reflection, on the paint, nothing more! --Orita Md.41 17:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

"The guns reflection, on the paint"? What the hell is that supposed to mean? Did you even look at the linked image?--PistolJunkie 17:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Orita - Its not, the reflection is just below, check the link above and try reading something before making yourself look stupid, just like the abomination of a pistol--Captain Snikt 23:16, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

It could work if it was a metal storm gun, but I doubt that's what there were going for.

the prop itself could be a ordinary black firing pistol is a large shell. the tubs attach to the black guns muzzle would direct the gasses out the two fake barrel. the two fake sides could also be attached to the blank guns side. making the illusion that the gun is being fired. Rex095

That... might actually be feasible...--PistolJunkie 00:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey, is that the guy who played the lead nazi in Inglorious Basterds? BeardedHoplite 01:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Ci, it's Christoph Waltz. Also, is there another shot that we can upload of this... thing (I presume that since no one has done it already that we can't use the one that's been linked to) so that morons who are too lazy to click the damned link will stop posting "iz a reflecton!!!11!1!One!"?--PistolJunkie 04:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Well this would have been avoided if another image would have been in use. Its not that hard to add an image. The one used on the page leaves everything open to interpretation. And links....theres no statement in the Rules, Standards and Principles that I should click links, but there is something about insults. --Orita Md.41 08:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)