 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Command & Conquer: Generals"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Not a jab, a reiteration of what is minimally expected to be done on a page, as is stated in the 'no effort' template. You want to take it as some kind of attack feel free but that's not really the deal. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 02:46, 28 October 2017 (EDT) | : Not a jab, a reiteration of what is minimally expected to be done on a page, as is stated in the 'no effort' template. You want to take it as some kind of attack feel free but that's not really the deal. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 02:46, 28 October 2017 (EDT) | ||
::Still, I agree that Funkychinaman's particular edit summary seemed rather provocative and like an easy way to discourage new users from editing here, and that he could have transmitted the message in a more polite way. I mean, Deathstrike has done a good start on the page with relevant screenshots, etc. (even if some are not the best quality), and as long as he is willing to continue the page it could maybe qualify under WIP status. I mean, it's not like some other users who have been dumping weapon titles/images without doing anything regarding screencaps or even descriptions. If you'd like to continue the page, Deathstrike, try to put preferably full-sized screenshots without cropping them. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 05:54, 28 October 2017 (EDT) | ::Still, I agree that Funkychinaman's particular edit summary seemed rather provocative and like an easy way to discourage new users from editing here, and that he could have transmitted the message in a more polite way. I mean, Deathstrike has done a good start on the page with relevant screenshots, etc. (even if some are not the best quality), and as long as he is willing to continue the page it could maybe qualify under WIP status. I mean, it's not like some other users who have been dumping weapon titles/images without doing anything regarding screencaps or even descriptions. If you'd like to continue the page, Deathstrike, try to put preferably full-sized screenshots without cropping them. --[[User:Ultimate94ninja|Ultimate94ninja]] ([[User talk:Ultimate94ninja|talk]]) 05:54, 28 October 2017 (EDT) | ||
| − | + | :::I dislike first day incompletes. If you're learning the ropes and need some time to figure out the process, then fine, that's what WIP and/or the talk page is for. But don't expect others to do work for you. But if anything thinks they can dump a few paragraphs on a page in the hopes that someone else will finish it, think again. As for this page, I '''did''' put it in WIP. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 22:21, 29 October 2017 (EDT) | |
== Galil == | == Galil == | ||
“Not really, Galil was extensively exported and turns up everywhere, not selling them directly doesn't mean they'd never get sold on or stolen” I thought we’re talking about ISIS or Al-Nusra-esque terrorist organization which is fighting all out war against the US, using Israeli weapons on widescale level, spreading them across the civilian dissidents who utilize them to burn down American hotels. But I’m not an expert so hey this could be possible I guess. —[[User:MohmarDeathstrike|MohmarDeathstrike]] ([[User talk:MohmarDeathstrike|talk]]) 01:12, 28 October 2017 (EDT) | “Not really, Galil was extensively exported and turns up everywhere, not selling them directly doesn't mean they'd never get sold on or stolen” I thought we’re talking about ISIS or Al-Nusra-esque terrorist organization which is fighting all out war against the US, using Israeli weapons on widescale level, spreading them across the civilian dissidents who utilize them to burn down American hotels. But I’m not an expert so hey this could be possible I guess. —[[User:MohmarDeathstrike|MohmarDeathstrike]] ([[User talk:MohmarDeathstrike|talk]]) 01:12, 28 October 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:21, 30 October 2017
“No one is doing your work for you.” is this supposed to be a jab at me? If the article is not meeting the standard or anything just delete it. No need for passive aggression. —MohmarDeathstrike (talk) 01:04, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
- Not a jab, a reiteration of what is minimally expected to be done on a page, as is stated in the 'no effort' template. You want to take it as some kind of attack feel free but that's not really the deal. StanTheMan (talk) 02:46, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
- Still, I agree that Funkychinaman's particular edit summary seemed rather provocative and like an easy way to discourage new users from editing here, and that he could have transmitted the message in a more polite way. I mean, Deathstrike has done a good start on the page with relevant screenshots, etc. (even if some are not the best quality), and as long as he is willing to continue the page it could maybe qualify under WIP status. I mean, it's not like some other users who have been dumping weapon titles/images without doing anything regarding screencaps or even descriptions. If you'd like to continue the page, Deathstrike, try to put preferably full-sized screenshots without cropping them. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 05:54, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
- I dislike first day incompletes. If you're learning the ropes and need some time to figure out the process, then fine, that's what WIP and/or the talk page is for. But don't expect others to do work for you. But if anything thinks they can dump a few paragraphs on a page in the hopes that someone else will finish it, think again. As for this page, I did put it in WIP. --Funkychinaman (talk) 22:21, 29 October 2017 (EDT)
- Still, I agree that Funkychinaman's particular edit summary seemed rather provocative and like an easy way to discourage new users from editing here, and that he could have transmitted the message in a more polite way. I mean, Deathstrike has done a good start on the page with relevant screenshots, etc. (even if some are not the best quality), and as long as he is willing to continue the page it could maybe qualify under WIP status. I mean, it's not like some other users who have been dumping weapon titles/images without doing anything regarding screencaps or even descriptions. If you'd like to continue the page, Deathstrike, try to put preferably full-sized screenshots without cropping them. --Ultimate94ninja (talk) 05:54, 28 October 2017 (EDT)
Galil
“Not really, Galil was extensively exported and turns up everywhere, not selling them directly doesn't mean they'd never get sold on or stolen” I thought we’re talking about ISIS or Al-Nusra-esque terrorist organization which is fighting all out war against the US, using Israeli weapons on widescale level, spreading them across the civilian dissidents who utilize them to burn down American hotels. But I’m not an expert so hey this could be possible I guess. —MohmarDeathstrike (talk) 01:12, 28 October 2017 (EDT)