 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009: Lost Memories"
Excalibur01 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:: Ah. Should we leave it as is? [[User:Ominae|Ominae]] 01:01, 21 July 2012 (CDT) | :: Ah. Should we leave it as is? [[User:Ominae|Ominae]] 01:01, 21 July 2012 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Honestly...It depends on who is working on the page. If I had did this page, my opinions is that yeah, they are terrorists. If someone is rutting for the freedom fighters, he would call them that. [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] 10:38, 21 July 2012 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:38, 21 July 2012
SPAS-12
Isn't the pump action on the SPAS-12 engaged for less powerful rounds, not more powerful? I was pretty certain that it exists to cycle the weapon when a less-than-lethal round or similar is used which lacks the necessary pressure to operate the weapon in semi-automatic mode. (I imagine this would also include the "non-functional" ammunition used for movie special effects, hence why SPAS-12s are forever being used in manual mode in film.) Atypicaloracle 13:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
It would make more sense showing the SWAT guy loading a more powerful round and needing to pump it to chamber the breaching shot. Excalibur01 03:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Just checked the wiki entry on SPAS-12, you were right about pump action only used for low pressure rounds. I got it backwards I guess... The entry has been corrected. Though it could be like Excalibur01 said, the agent was actually loading a breaching round in.--Wildcards 05:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Interesting movie
This was one of the more interesting movies out there about Japan and Korea Excalibur01 18:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Something urgent
It seems the page's been changed to portray the Fureisenjin as "terrorists", based on the description, as freedom fighters. Ominae 22:09, 20 July 2012 (CDT)
- One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. In this case, it works both ways and after watching the movie with the intent to review it, I am against the "good guys" Excalibur01 00:02, 21 July 2012 (CDT)
- Ah. Should we leave it as is? Ominae 01:01, 21 July 2012 (CDT)
- Honestly...It depends on who is working on the page. If I had did this page, my opinions is that yeah, they are terrorists. If someone is rutting for the freedom fighters, he would call them that. Excalibur01 10:38, 21 July 2012 (CDT)