 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:PPSh-41"
Lone Soldier (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
of the submashingun are somewhat different from the Shpagin/Sudaiev system. | of the submashingun are somewhat different from the Shpagin/Sudaiev system. | ||
However may be correct put the KP-31 and the PPD togeder, becous the PPD is a direct derivation of the finnish s.m.g. - [[User:Lone Soldier|Lone Soldier]] 10-28-2009 12:17 | However may be correct put the KP-31 and the PPD togeder, becous the PPD is a direct derivation of the finnish s.m.g. - [[User:Lone Soldier|Lone Soldier]] 10-28-2009 12:17 | ||
| + | |||
| + | The PPS deserves it's own page. It's a completely different weapon. The only thing it has in common with the PPSh is the ammo. It can't even share mags. And tthe PPD can go on the MP-28 page. (Or just lump the MP18, MP28, Lanchester and PPD all on one page.) --[[User:Funkychinaman|funkychinaman]] 17:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:40, 29 December 2010
how many times must I to write this PPS 43 not PPSh ,it was build by Sudaiev not Shpagin.
Does the page look more organized now?
Move the KP-31 and the PPD on another page
I think that it's better move the description of the finnish KP-31 and the soviet PPD on page apart: The mechanical sistem of the submashingun are somewhat different from the Shpagin/Sudaiev system. However may be correct put the KP-31 and the PPD togeder, becous the PPD is a direct derivation of the finnish s.m.g. - Lone Soldier 10-28-2009 12:17
The PPS deserves it's own page. It's a completely different weapon. The only thing it has in common with the PPSh is the ammo. It can't even share mags. And tthe PPD can go on the MP-28 page. (Or just lump the MP18, MP28, Lanchester and PPD all on one page.) --funkychinaman 17:40, 29 December 2010 (UTC)