Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:SIG-Sauer P320"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Additional Images= | =Additional Images= | ||
+ | [[File:SIG-P320-FS-MHS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|XM17 MHS with 21-round magazine - 9x19mm]] | ||
+ | [[File:SIG-P320-C-MHS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|XM18 MHS - 9x19mm]] | ||
+ | [[File:M17 MHS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M17 MHS with 21-round magazine - 9x19mm. This is an early military-issued model with tan controls (safety, slide release, takedown lever, and magazine release) like the XM17. Controls on later models were changed to black.]] | ||
+ | [[File:M18 MHS.jpg|thumb|none|400px|M18 Commemorative Edition - 9x19mm]] | ||
[[File:P320-M17.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG-Sauer P320-M17 - 9x19mm. This commercial version of the M17 MHS comes in versions both with and without the manual safety of the military model.]] | [[File:P320-M17.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG-Sauer P320-M17 - 9x19mm. This commercial version of the M17 MHS comes in versions both with and without the manual safety of the military model.]] | ||
[[File:SIG P320-M18.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG-Sauer P320-M18 - 9x19mm]] | [[File:SIG P320-M18.jpg|thumb|none|400px|SIG-Sauer P320-M18 - 9x19mm]] |
Latest revision as of 22:40, 4 February 2024
Additional Images
Discussion
MHS
Any opposition to me uploading pics of the XM17 and XM18 pistols? Probably not long before they start appearing in video games. Spartan198 (talk) 03:01, 29 November 2017 (EST)
- Actually, the M17 is already planned to be added to Squad.--AgentGumby (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2017 (EST)
- That's actually a standard P320. The rail on the frame is too long (the Army uses the "Carry" frame for both variants, as seen above) and it lacks the MHS' manual safety. Spartan198 (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2017 (EST)
- Yeah, I guess it's still a WIP as I don't think they've released in the official game yet.--AgentGumby (talk) 21:19, 29 November 2017 (EST)
- That's actually a standard P320. The rail on the frame is too long (the Army uses the "Carry" frame for both variants, as seen above) and it lacks the MHS' manual safety. Spartan198 (talk) 20:44, 29 November 2017 (EST)
If you put 'dem in the talk page nobody can say you anything. (Although they need to be shifted when they will APPEAR in a game/movie/media...) Is standard procedure--Dannyguns (talk) 09:34, 29 November 2017 (EST)
Separating M17 and M18
Since the Beretta 92 page has separate entries for the 92FS and M9 even though they're fundamentally the same gun, so I think it would make sense to give the M17/M18 and their commercial variants their own separate entries. Spartan198 (talk) 15:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)