 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Saw (2004)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Smith & Wesson== | ==Smith & Wesson== | ||
| − | There is to my knowledge NO Model 66 made that has a full underlug shroud. Unless it was some (extremely rare) special run, but that's doubtful. All-told I'm almost certain the gun is a Model 686. Early-version 686s featured rounded cylinder releases. As for the sights and hammer, these are | + | There is to my knowledge NO Model 66 made that has a full underlug shroud. Unless it was some (extremely rare) special run, but that's doubtful. All-told I'm almost certain the gun is indeed a Model 686. Compare the 'screen-used' gun image with that of a 66 and it's clear the frame isn't exactly the same. As for the 'note': Early-version 686s featured rounded cylinder releases. As for the sights and hammer, these are/were parts shared across several S&W models. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 22:46, 26 October 2020 (EDT) |
Revision as of 02:58, 27 October 2020
Smith & Wesson
There is to my knowledge NO Model 66 made that has a full underlug shroud. Unless it was some (extremely rare) special run, but that's doubtful. All-told I'm almost certain the gun is indeed a Model 686. Compare the 'screen-used' gun image with that of a 66 and it's clear the frame isn't exactly the same. As for the 'note': Early-version 686s featured rounded cylinder releases. As for the sights and hammer, these are/were parts shared across several S&W models. StanTheMan (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2020 (EDT)