 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mk 153 SMAW"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Proposed name change) |
(→SMAW-D: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I wont make any changes until i have permission form an admin and if he/she agrees with me here | I wont make any changes until i have permission form an admin and if he/she agrees with me here | ||
[[User:EoghanG93|EoghanG93]] 06:30, 27 June 2012 (CDT) | [[User:EoghanG93|EoghanG93]] 06:30, 27 June 2012 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == SMAW-D == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should this really even be on the same page? I don't think it has anything in common with the Mk 153 other than the name and using the same warhead. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 04:07, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:07, 26 September 2017
Proposed name change
My opinion is that this page should be renamed B-300 as it was the very original version made by the israelis. But the actual m153 SMAW should still be featured on this page in additional variants section beneath the b-300 (which i intend to move to the top of the page above m153 smaw) I wont make any changes until i have permission form an admin and if he/she agrees with me here EoghanG93 06:30, 27 June 2012 (CDT)
SMAW-D
Should this really even be on the same page? I don't think it has anything in common with the Mk 153 other than the name and using the same warhead. Evil Tim (talk) 04:07, 26 September 2017 (EDT)