Talk:Karma Online

If you don't mind me asking, why was this page nuked? It seemed complete to me.--SeanWolf (talk) 15:07, 16 July 2016 (EDT)

because this game does not exist.--Emto_PL (talk) 17:19, 16 July 2016 (EDT)

I don't think we should delete the page just because you can't play the game anymore.--Quarax (talk) 18:07, 16 July 2016 (EDT)

That's what I was thinking too. Maybe have the page up but state that the game is no longer playable?--SeanWolf (talk) 23:04, 16 July 2016 (EDT)

Sounds good.--Quarax (talk) 23:22, 16 July 2016 (EDT)

I'd like an admin to weigh in personally but I agree as long as the title meets (or rather, met) the other stated requirements the game no longer being playable doesn't by itself make the page automatically ineligible I think. That said, if the page does stay, someone will need to go through all the game caps and remove the 'nuke' tags from them as well. StanTheMan (talk) 02:57, 17 July 2016 (EDT)

I concur with the decision to keep the page. I'll start removing 'nuke' from images but it will take some time. Greg-Z (talk) 06:39, 17 July 2016 (EDT)

Is the page complete? --Funkychinaman (talk) 08:59, 17 July 2016 (EDT)

Honestly I think it is absolutely absurd to delete a page just because you cannot play a game any longer. People still could check what weapons were featured in this game, no matter if you can play it or not. It should definitely stay. --Hchris (talk) 12:51, 17 July 2016 (EDT)

It won't be deleted if it's complete, but if the page is incomplete and there is no way to complete the page, we'll move it to the discussion page. --Funkychinaman (talk) 13:37, 17 July 2016 (EDT)

We live in the age, where preserved videos and screenshots of the game are bound to be somewhere, so I'm pretty sure that the way to complete the article exists. It's one of the weirdest deletion on any wiki-type website I've seen. --Kloga (talk) 10:59, 18 July 2016 (EDT)

I contacted the OP, and he said he hadn't played the game for a while before shutdown, so he wasn't sure if the page was complete or not. Oh well, let's assume it is and leave it up. --Funkychinaman (talk) 09:59, 19 July 2016 (EDT)

Writeups in sections look a bit weak, but the formatting and layout looks ok and all the sections have caps, unless it's missing a lot of stuff it's complete enough I'd say. StanTheMan (talk) 17:37, 19 July 2016 (EDT)