 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Talk:The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Special Thanks
The idea and screenshots are provided by AVSniff, forum.guns.ru.--Greg-Z (talk) 13:46, 19 November 2019 (EST)
Unidentified revolver
This might be a Colt New Service such as this:
LJ (talk) 17:12, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
- No. --Slon95 (talk) 19:04, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
- It has an Adams patent ejector and the size looks proper for a .32/.38 revolver so one of the Webley .32/.38 pocket models would almost certainly match up lookswise with the revolver we see. A Webley Model 83 with a four inch barrel could be the gun. https://www.gunsamerica.com/userimages/144505/997021864/wm_4021548.jpg This will take you to an image of a Model 83 to look over and see if you agree on the possibility of it being a match. Black Irish Paddy (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2022 (EDT)
- I found this article regarding a Webley No. 5 variant with small frame and round barrel https://www.thebroadarrow.info/webley-no5-360cf-revolverLJ (talk) 17:21, 11 May 2022 (EDT)
- After comparison I am tending towards the 4.5" Webley No. 5, unless some additional discussion occurs (hopefully more than a monosyllable).LJ (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2022 (EDT)
- I strongly doubt in it. The second revolver lacks the trigger guard, so it most likely has a folding trigger that never was used on Webley No 5. My best guess is that this is a Belgian pocket version of Webley RIC/Bulldog, chambered in calibers about .38 or .32. Such revolvers are not uncommon in British productions of 1950s-1970s.--Greg-Z (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2022 (EDT)
- After comparison I am tending towards the 4.5" Webley No. 5, unless some additional discussion occurs (hopefully more than a monosyllable).LJ (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2022 (EDT)