 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bergmann 1894"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I suspect again it is better to merge this with [[Bergmann 1896]]. Especially considering that there used is not even a real one. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 13:04, 18 November 2019 (EST) | I suspect again it is better to merge this with [[Bergmann 1896]]. Especially considering that there used is not even a real one. --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 13:04, 18 November 2019 (EST) | ||
:Yes, it makes sense as both 1894 and 1896 models had same blowback action, and M94 was produced only in prototypes. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 13:41, 18 November 2019 (EST) | :Yes, it makes sense as both 1894 and 1896 models had same blowback action, and M94 was produced only in prototypes. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 13:41, 18 November 2019 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Going further, shouldn't all this be finally merged with [[Bergmann-Bayard]]? --[[User:Slon95|Slon95]] ([[User talk:Slon95|talk]]) 13:08, 20 November 2019 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 20 November 2019
I suspect again it is better to merge this with Bergmann 1896. Especially considering that there used is not even a real one. --Slon95 (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2019 (EST)
- Yes, it makes sense as both 1894 and 1896 models had same blowback action, and M94 was produced only in prototypes. --Greg-Z (talk) 13:41, 18 November 2019 (EST)
- Going further, shouldn't all this be finally merged with Bergmann-Bayard? --Slon95 (talk) 13:08, 20 November 2019 (EST)