 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:SCP Containment Breach"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
AgentGumby (talk | contribs) m (→Indie status) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Unless there are more weapons, does this game really warrant an entry?--[[User:AgentGumby|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby|talk]]) 23:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT) | Unless there are more weapons, does this game really warrant an entry?--[[User:AgentGumby|AgentGumby]] ([[User talk:AgentGumby|talk]]) 23:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
: I'm leaning more to this title not meeting [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#Videogames_must_be_professionally_distributed_titles|distribution requirements]]. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 03:09, 12 September 2016 (EDT) | : I'm leaning more to this title not meeting [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#Videogames_must_be_professionally_distributed_titles|distribution requirements]]. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 03:09, 12 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Yah, agreed with that too. | ||
Revision as of 22:58, 12 September 2016
Indie status
Unless there are more weapons, does this game really warrant an entry?--AgentGumby (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2016 (EDT)
- I'm leaning more to this title not meeting distribution requirements. StanTheMan (talk) 03:09, 12 September 2016 (EDT)
- Yah, agreed with that too.