 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Vampire Sex Diaries"
(Created page with "The revolver has unsupported extractor rod that is best seen on the fourth screenshot. The grooves on the cylinder are shorter and more shallow than on S&W 10. Maybe the revol...") |
m (WZHBot moved page Talk:Vampire Sex Diaries, The to Talk:The Vampire Sex Diaries: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The revolver has unsupported extractor rod that is best seen on the fourth screenshot. The grooves on the cylinder are shorter and more shallow than on S&W 10. Maybe the revolver is some kind of replica gun that not follows the base gun in all details. Or it's some different revolver that I don't know. Anyway, there are differences from Model 10. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 01:44, 10 January 2022 (EST) | The revolver has unsupported extractor rod that is best seen on the fourth screenshot. The grooves on the cylinder are shorter and more shallow than on S&W 10. Maybe the revolver is some kind of replica gun that not follows the base gun in all details. Or it's some different revolver that I don't know. Anyway, there are differences from Model 10. --[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 01:44, 10 January 2022 (EST) | ||
| + | :Maybe [[Colt M1917 Revolver]] or [[Smith & Wesson Model 10|Smith & Wesson Model of 1899 M&P]]? [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 09:15, 10 January 2022 (EST) | ||
| + | [[File:ColtModel1917ArmyEx.jpg|thumb|450px|none|Colt M1917 Revolver (Military issue with lanyard ring) - .45 ACP. Note the unsupported ejector rod - common of Colt revolvers of the period, as well as the Colt-style cylinder release latch and blade front sight. Smooth walnut grips were used on all WWI issue Model 1917 specimens]] | ||
| + | [[Image:HA-537.jpg|thumb|none|400px|Smith & Wesson Model of 1899 M&P (1899-1902) - .38 Special]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Krssnngok 9.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Krssnngok 10.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Krssnngok 11.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Krssnngok 5.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Krssnngok 13.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
| + | [[Image:Krssnngok 14.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
| + | As far as I see, none of these two. The frame is more in S&W style, less sloped than on Colts. The barrel is thick but slightly tapered at its base. And the cylinder has very short grooves, only about a half of the length of the cylinder itself which is not common for real guns, that's why I think about blank-firing replica. Sorry, I cannot propose any idea, need more knowing expert than me.--[[User:Greg-Z|Greg-Z]] ([[User talk:Greg-Z|talk]]) 10:37, 10 January 2022 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:00, 29 July 2023
The revolver has unsupported extractor rod that is best seen on the fourth screenshot. The grooves on the cylinder are shorter and more shallow than on S&W 10. Maybe the revolver is some kind of replica gun that not follows the base gun in all details. Or it's some different revolver that I don't know. Anyway, there are differences from Model 10. --Greg-Z (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2022 (EST)
- Maybe Colt M1917 Revolver or Smith & Wesson Model of 1899 M&P? Pyramid Silent (talk) 09:15, 10 January 2022 (EST)
As far as I see, none of these two. The frame is more in S&W style, less sloped than on Colts. The barrel is thick but slightly tapered at its base. And the cylinder has very short grooves, only about a half of the length of the cylinder itself which is not common for real guns, that's why I think about blank-firing replica. Sorry, I cannot propose any idea, need more knowing expert than me.--Greg-Z (talk) 10:37, 10 January 2022 (EST)