 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "User:Jackie.45Cal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jackie.45Cal (talk | contribs) |
Jackie.45Cal (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I really like Higher caliber Automatics. Not really much else to say. Also quite partial to | + | I really like Higher caliber Automatics. Not really much else to say. Also quite partial to Glocks and Smith Autos, although they are good weapons and I have used them in service, I don't like high slides weapons like sigs or H&K's, If I have my preference that is. As you may have guessed from my first statement, the 1911 design. |
| + | |||
| + | I personally dis-like large barrel revolvers and Automatics, for practical use. I understand that they have their place in target shooting but, to me, they completely go against the intention of a sidearm. I DO NOT LIKE THE DEASERT EAGAL. | ||
Revision as of 23:19, 29 September 2010
I really like Higher caliber Automatics. Not really much else to say. Also quite partial to Glocks and Smith Autos, although they are good weapons and I have used them in service, I don't like high slides weapons like sigs or H&K's, If I have my preference that is. As you may have guessed from my first statement, the 1911 design.
I personally dis-like large barrel revolvers and Automatics, for practical use. I understand that they have their place in target shooting but, to me, they completely go against the intention of a sidearm. I DO NOT LIKE THE DEASERT EAGAL.