Join our Discord! |
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Type 91 MANPADS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
AnActualAK47 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:It doesn't appear to be based on the Stinger. The similar appearance is likely a coincidence. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 20:56, 20 February 2016 (EST) | :It doesn't appear to be based on the Stinger. The similar appearance is likely a coincidence. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 20:56, 20 February 2016 (EST) | ||
::That's a helluva coincidence.--[[User:AnActualAK47|AnActualAK47]] ([[User talk:AnActualAK47|talk]]) 21:19, 20 February 2016 (EST) | ::That's a helluva coincidence.--[[User:AnActualAK47|AnActualAK47]] ([[User talk:AnActualAK47|talk]]) 21:19, 20 February 2016 (EST) | ||
+ | :::Indeed. I won't be surprised if Toshiba used th Stinger as a basis since it's their first and only indig MANPAD in service with the Kai version out. [[User:Ominae|Ominae]] ([[User talk:Ominae|talk]]) 21:51, 20 February 2016 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 02:51, 21 February 2016
Is this thing based of the FIM-92?--AnActualAK47 (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2016 (EST)
- Yes, but Toshiba made the components a bit better than the Stingers when they used it before. Ominae (talk) 18:57, 20 February 2016 (EST)
- It doesn't appear to be based on the Stinger. The similar appearance is likely a coincidence. --Funkychinaman (talk) 20:56, 20 February 2016 (EST)
- That's a helluva coincidence.--AnActualAK47 (talk) 21:19, 20 February 2016 (EST)