 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ransom (1996)"
Jackie.45Cal (talk | contribs) |
Jackie.45Cal (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Correction - the FBI tested but never adopted the 10MM. (g. wood) | Correction - the FBI tested but never adopted the 10MM. (g. wood) | ||
| − | (In 1990 the FBI certainly did adopt the 10mm in the model SW 1076 decocker only pistol) | + | (In 1990 the FBI certainly did adopt the 10mm in the model SW 1076 decocker only pistol) |
| + | |||
| + | ==Smith Auto== | ||
| + | I did the same thing here. --[[User:Jackie.45Cal|Jackie.45Cal]] 12:11, 6 April 2011 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:ransom041.jpg|thumb|none|500px|FBI Special Agent Lonnie Hawkins ([[Delroy Lindo]]) draws his 659.]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think this is actually a Smith & Wesson 5946 because the gun does not appear to have a decocker. The 5946 is authorised by the NYPD but maby not for the FBI. | ||
| + | |||
| + | -And in the picture above the gun does not have the removable barrel bushing that 659s have. | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 6 April 2011
Pointless comments
Someone needs to take a little look see on this page, the anachronisms comments have gotten a little out of hand. There are also a couple of obvious mistakes.
FBI 10MM Debate
I've moved these from the main page. Not only are these comments a little silly, they were posted in the wrong place. --Jackie.45Cal 12:08, 6 April 2011 (CDT)
Correction - the FBI tested but never adopted the 10MM. (g. wood)
(In 1990 the FBI certainly did adopt the 10mm in the model SW 1076 decocker only pistol)
Smith Auto
I did the same thing here. --Jackie.45Cal 12:11, 6 April 2011 (CDT)
I think this is actually a Smith & Wesson 5946 because the gun does not appear to have a decocker. The 5946 is authorised by the NYPD but maby not for the FBI.
-And in the picture above the gun does not have the removable barrel bushing that 659s have.