Discord-logo.jpg Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D."

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[File:Shield S01E01 008.jpg|thumb|600px|none|]]
 
[[File:Shield S01E01 008.jpg|thumb|600px|none|]]
 
:The mounts for the engines look overly complicated to me, so my guess is that the plane will turn out to be a VTOL. In that case the only time the rear engines would be needed is for that, when the front engines would be pointing down away from them. Am I correct in thinking that this is a C-17 with bits bolted/CG'd on? (and by bits I mainly mean the second set of lower tail fins with the rear engines) --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 12:17, 25 September 2013 (EDT)
 
:The mounts for the engines look overly complicated to me, so my guess is that the plane will turn out to be a VTOL. In that case the only time the rear engines would be needed is for that, when the front engines would be pointing down away from them. Am I correct in thinking that this is a C-17 with bits bolted/CG'd on? (and by bits I mainly mean the second set of lower tail fins with the rear engines) --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 12:17, 25 September 2013 (EDT)
 +
::It looks like a C-17 to me as well. The hanger has a cutout for the plane's vertical stabilizer, but won't work for this plane since it has a T-tail. I can't tell from the shots if that will be a problem for this plane. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 12:27, 25 September 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:27, 25 September 2013

Transport

Dorky plane complaint: Wouldn't the jetwash from the front engines disrupt the airflow to the rear engines? --Funkychinaman (talk) 11:55, 25 September 2013 (EDT)

The mounts for the engines look overly complicated to me, so my guess is that the plane will turn out to be a VTOL. In that case the only time the rear engines would be needed is for that, when the front engines would be pointing down away from them. Am I correct in thinking that this is a C-17 with bits bolted/CG'd on? (and by bits I mainly mean the second set of lower tail fins with the rear engines) --commando552 (talk) 12:17, 25 September 2013 (EDT)
It looks like a C-17 to me as well. The hanger has a cutout for the plane's vertical stabilizer, but won't work for this plane since it has a T-tail. I can't tell from the shots if that will be a problem for this plane. --Funkychinaman (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2013 (EDT)

Do Not Sell My Personal Information