 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Crye Associates MR-C"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Evil Tim moved page Talk:(Ghost Recon) - Crye Associates MR-C to Talk:Crye Associates MR-C) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
(Ghost Recon) should not be included in the title, as the gun was not built for Ghost Recon. --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:27, 4 February 2012 (CST) | (Ghost Recon) should not be included in the title, as the gun was not built for Ghost Recon. --[[User:Bozitojugg3rn4ut|bozitojugg3rn4ut]] 13:27, 4 February 2012 (CST) | ||
| − | :I put it here because the gun is effectively fictional, it's just kind of an odd case. I don't think we have any other guns that only existed as mockups that have their own pages. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 16:07, 4 January 2015 (EST) | + | :I put it here because the gun is effectively fictional, it's just kind of an odd case. I don't think we have any other guns that only existed as nonfunctional mockups that have their own pages. [[User:Evil Tim|Evil Tim]] ([[User talk:Evil Tim|talk]]) 16:07, 4 January 2015 (EST) |
| + | ::[[Saritch|Well now we have]]. I think that the (Ghost Recon) should be removed because it implies that the weapon is somehow fundamentally related to the development of Ghost Recon, which it isn't. --[[User:Wuzh|Wuzh]] ([[User talk:Wuzh|talk]]) 21:33, 28 April 2018 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:33, 30 April 2018
(Ghost Recon) should not be included in the title, as the gun was not built for Ghost Recon. --bozitojugg3rn4ut 13:27, 4 February 2012 (CST)
- I put it here because the gun is effectively fictional, it's just kind of an odd case. I don't think we have any other guns that only existed as nonfunctional mockups that have their own pages. Evil Tim (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2015 (EST)
- Well now we have. I think that the (Ghost Recon) should be removed because it implies that the weapon is somehow fundamentally related to the development of Ghost Recon, which it isn't. --Wuzh (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2018 (EDT)