Discord-logo.jpg Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Talk:2009: Lost Memories

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Revision as of 02:25, 25 August 2012 by Excalibur01 (talk | contribs) (→‎Interesting movie)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

SPAS-12

Isn't the pump action on the SPAS-12 engaged for less powerful rounds, not more powerful? I was pretty certain that it exists to cycle the weapon when a less-than-lethal round or similar is used which lacks the necessary pressure to operate the weapon in semi-automatic mode. (I imagine this would also include the "non-functional" ammunition used for movie special effects, hence why SPAS-12s are forever being used in manual mode in film.) Atypicaloracle 13:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

It would make more sense showing the SWAT guy loading a more powerful round and needing to pump it to chamber the breaching shot. Excalibur01 03:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Just checked the wiki entry on SPAS-12, you were right about pump action only used for low pressure rounds. I got it backwards I guess... The entry has been corrected. Though it could be like Excalibur01 said, the agent was actually loading a breaching round in.--Wildcards 05:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Interesting movie

This was one of the more interesting movies out there about Japan and Korea Excalibur01 18:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I recall a while back, I made this comment about how this was an interesting movie. After remembering my history, I wonder how the world really would be different if Imperial Japan not only survived WWII, but came out on top and really, I don't think any of us would like it. Of course, the movies doesn't tell us how good or bad the world is off with obviously a modern day Imperial Japan thriving instead of an American influenced one. Excalibur01 21:25, 24 August 2012 (CDT)

Something urgent

It seems the page's been changed to portray the Fureisenjin as "terrorists", based on the description, as freedom fighters. Ominae 22:09, 20 July 2012 (CDT)

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. In this case, it works both ways and after watching the movie with the intent to review it, I am against the "good guys" Excalibur01 00:02, 21 July 2012 (CDT)
Ah. Should we leave it as is? Ominae 01:01, 21 July 2012 (CDT)
Honestly...It depends on who is working on the page. If I had did this page, my opinions is that yeah, they are terrorists. If someone is rutting for the freedom fighters, he would call them that. Excalibur01 10:38, 21 July 2012 (CDT)

Well, I wrote them as terrorists when I uploaded all the images because that's pretty much what they do. Guess it pissed off some people...lol (checked the history on the edit...) --Wildcards 19:03, 24 August 2012 (CDT)

Maybe split the difference and go with "insurgents?" And I can't help but notice that whoever did this page didn't include the name of a single actor. Can someone do that? --Funkychinaman 19:07, 24 August 2012 (CDT)

I didn't really know much Japanese and Korean stars, I'll get right on it.--Wildcards 19:09, 24 August 2012 (CDT)
Well, I was thinking matching up characters with names in IMDb. I'd do it myself, but I've never seen the movie, so I don't know who the characters are. --Funkychinaman 19:20, 24 August 2012 (CDT)

Do Not Sell My Personal Information