 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Total Recall (1990)"
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) |
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Guess we better bring it Bunnie's attention. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 17:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | Guess we better bring it Bunnie's attention. --[[User:Jcordell|Jcordell]] 17:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | :- Indeed. I find this rather disconcerting. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 18:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | + | :- Indeed. I find this rather disconcerting. EDIT - <br><br><br>''Please do not misslead the public with a knowingly posting incorect info. We highly recommend to delete any and all postings as to the claridges. |
| + | |||
| + | I highly recommend to bar the originator of the Page as you are liable of miss representation. I will also forward this to my attorney: Dr. Webb for further action. '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bah, the comment could have been posted as an honest mistake. Nonetheless, as a information resource, it's worth nothing the ordeal with Claridge to provide better background/history on the weapon itself. But, well, I guess it's up to you admins - As for 'barring' the original poster, it seems the one who started the page hasn;t been here for nearly three years. Bah, again, this is just a bit disturbing. [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] 18:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:16, 19 September 2010
Holy @%?!
Is the Goncz comment on the Main Page legit? If so, are we gonna have to remove the gun's page, or.. well, lets just say should I be worried this might be one of those feared legal things that risk the integrity of the whole site? I know there was some controversial history over this weapon, as noted by the info on the gun's page. Anyway, what does all this mean? StanTheMan 17:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Guess we better bring it Bunnie's attention. --Jcordell 17:59, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- - Indeed. I find this rather disconcerting. EDIT -
Please do not misslead the public with a knowingly posting incorect info. We highly recommend to delete any and all postings as to the claridges.
I highly recommend to bar the originator of the Page as you are liable of miss representation. I will also forward this to my attorney: Dr. Webb for further action.
Bah, the comment could have been posted as an honest mistake. Nonetheless, as a information resource, it's worth nothing the ordeal with Claridge to provide better background/history on the weapon itself. But, well, I guess it's up to you admins - As for 'barring' the original poster, it seems the one who started the page hasn;t been here for nearly three years. Bah, again, this is just a bit disturbing. StanTheMan 18:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)