 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nobody Loses All the Time"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
Does this meet the standard for [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#Short_films_must_meet_a_minimum_standard|short films]]? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 00:02, 9 January 2012 (CST) | Does this meet the standard for [[Rules,_Standards_and_Principles#Short_films_must_meet_a_minimum_standard|short films]]? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] 00:02, 9 January 2012 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 21:26, 9 January 2012
Bonus! Signed poster
Along with a copy of the short, Mr. Travis sent me a autographed copy of the poster. BeardedHoplite 18:19, 8 January 2012 (CST)
Discussion
Does this meet the standard for short films? --Funkychinaman 00:02, 9 January 2012 (CST)
I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. BeardedHoplite 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)