Discord-logo.jpg Join our Discord!
If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nobody Loses All the Time"

From Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)
 
I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. [[User:BeardedHoplite|BeardedHoplite]] 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)
 +
::Uh, NOT NECESSARILY.  It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs.  The IMDB entry is lean to say the least.  No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism.  It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real?  If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it.  the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page.  [[User:MoviePropMaster2008|MoviePropMaster2008]] 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)

Revision as of 03:57, 10 January 2012

Bonus! Signed poster

Along with a copy of the short, Mr. Travis sent me a autographed copy of the poster. BeardedHoplite 18:19, 8 January 2012 (CST)

NLAT Bonus.jpg

Discussion

Does this meet the standard for short films? --Funkychinaman 00:02, 9 January 2012 (CST)

I would say yes. The pistol is airsoft, yes, but the film itself is fully professional. It was shot on film (old stuff, too, the picture is more than a little grainy.) The quality of it is way above the colledge shorts that were warned against on the rules page. Plus there is the SAA. BeardedHoplite 15:26, 9 January 2012 (CST)

Uh, NOT NECESSARILY. It has not been documented as being released ANYWHERE, no famous festivals, no limited runs. The IMDB entry is lean to say the least. No one other than you can vouch for the professionalism. It has just a very FEW airsoft pieces, even the SAA, can you verify it is real? If a short has an insane amount of obviously REAL guns then we might (MIGHT!) allow it. the quality clause should probably be clarified, but this is one of those cases where the professionalism has to be VERIFIED by someone other than the creator of the page. MoviePropMaster2008 21:57, 9 January 2012 (CST)

Do Not Sell My Personal Information