 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black Butler I"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commando552 (talk | contribs) |
Excalibur01 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Image:Black Butler FN Model1900.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | [[Image:Black Butler FN Model1900.jpg|thumb|none|600px|]] | ||
:It is pretty badly drawn, but I would say that it is 100% intended to be an FN Model 1900. It has the raised rear sight block, the cocking lugs on the slide, the two screws to hold in the breech block, the correct profiling of the slide with the indent between the barrel and recoil spring, the ejection port is in the right place and is the correct design (square front with quarter round back, and not covered like a Langenhan), and the raised side plate on the frame itself is the right shape although it looks wrong due to the fact that the frame doesn't scallop up at the front of the trigger guard and the slide and frame are merged together (with the front of the slide being oversized) due to lack of detail in the drawing. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 16:27, 9 September 2016 (EDT) | :It is pretty badly drawn, but I would say that it is 100% intended to be an FN Model 1900. It has the raised rear sight block, the cocking lugs on the slide, the two screws to hold in the breech block, the correct profiling of the slide with the indent between the barrel and recoil spring, the ejection port is in the right place and is the correct design (square front with quarter round back, and not covered like a Langenhan), and the raised side plate on the frame itself is the right shape although it looks wrong due to the fact that the frame doesn't scallop up at the front of the trigger guard and the slide and frame are merged together (with the front of the slide being oversized) due to lack of detail in the drawing. --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 16:27, 9 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's kinda hard to tell if the rifle is an Enfield really. It could be any bolt action rifle with an exposed magazine [[User:Excalibur01|Excalibur01]] ([[User talk:Excalibur01|talk]]) 17:04, 9 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:04, 9 September 2016
Fn Model 1900?
Ok, I may not know that much about firearms, but even I have to question the legitimacy of this. It honestly looks like a generic hand gun with parts of the Fn Model 1900 glued on.--SeanWolf (talk) 14:23, 9 September 2016 (EDT)
- It is pretty badly drawn, but I would say that it is 100% intended to be an FN Model 1900. It has the raised rear sight block, the cocking lugs on the slide, the two screws to hold in the breech block, the correct profiling of the slide with the indent between the barrel and recoil spring, the ejection port is in the right place and is the correct design (square front with quarter round back, and not covered like a Langenhan), and the raised side plate on the frame itself is the right shape although it looks wrong due to the fact that the frame doesn't scallop up at the front of the trigger guard and the slide and frame are merged together (with the front of the slide being oversized) due to lack of detail in the drawing. --commando552 (talk) 16:27, 9 September 2016 (EDT)
It's kinda hard to tell if the rifle is an Enfield really. It could be any bolt action rifle with an exposed magazine Excalibur01 (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2016 (EDT)