 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:(Blade Runner) - LAPD 2019 Blaster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StanTheMan (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page doesn't follow much of the typically recognized formatting or layout standards and is all over the place with numerous additional (and arguably extraneous) images and sections, including a section on 'Replicas' which I think is a tad outside our scope. I really think the page should really be condensed and refocused with most of that secondary material moved here, if not deleted. Wasn't there already another page for this gun, BTW? [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:53, 14 July 2016 (EDT) | This page doesn't follow much of the typically recognized formatting or layout standards and is all over the place with numerous additional (and arguably extraneous) images and sections, including a section on 'Replicas' which I think is a tad outside our scope. I really think the page should really be condensed and refocused with most of that secondary material moved here, if not deleted. Wasn't there already another page for this gun, BTW? [[User:StanTheMan|StanTheMan]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan|talk]]) 15:53, 14 July 2016 (EDT) | ||
| + | :You'd think there would be. I'm a bit surprised it took this long. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 16:04, 14 July 2016 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:04, 14 July 2016
This page doesn't follow much of the typically recognized formatting or layout standards and is all over the place with numerous additional (and arguably extraneous) images and sections, including a section on 'Replicas' which I think is a tad outside our scope. I really think the page should really be condensed and refocused with most of that secondary material moved here, if not deleted. Wasn't there already another page for this gun, BTW? StanTheMan (talk) 15:53, 14 July 2016 (EDT)
- You'd think there would be. I'm a bit surprised it took this long. --Funkychinaman (talk) 16:04, 14 July 2016 (EDT)