 Join our Discord!
|
| If you have been locked out of your account you can request a password reset here. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Descent: Part 2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (WZHBot moved page Talk:Descent: Part 2, The to Talk:The Descent: Part 2: Bot: Fixing title according to new titling rule.) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's definitely not a S&W 13. You can see adjustable sights in the caps. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 17:41, 26 October 2014 (EDT) | It's definitely not a S&W 13. You can see adjustable sights in the caps. --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 17:41, 26 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
:But, what do you think, what is it? [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 18:02, 26 October 2014 (EDT) | :But, what do you think, what is it? [[User:Pyramid Silent|Pyramid Silent]] ([[User talk:Pyramid Silent|talk]]) 18:02, 26 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Do you have any better shots of it? --[[User:Funkychinaman|Funkychinaman]] ([[User talk:Funkychinaman|talk]]) 18:46, 26 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Based on the fact that it has adjustable sight, a shrouded ejector rod, and that there is not tapering at the rear of the barrel, my guess would be a [[Smith & Wesson Model 19]] --[[User:Commando552|commando552]] ([[User talk:Commando552|talk]]) 18:54, 26 October 2014 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:29, 28 July 2023
It's definitely not a S&W 13. You can see adjustable sights in the caps. --Funkychinaman (talk) 17:41, 26 October 2014 (EDT)
- But, what do you think, what is it? Pyramid Silent (talk) 18:02, 26 October 2014 (EDT)
- Do you have any better shots of it? --Funkychinaman (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2014 (EDT)
- Based on the fact that it has adjustable sight, a shrouded ejector rod, and that there is not tapering at the rear of the barrel, my guess would be a Smith & Wesson Model 19 --commando552 (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2014 (EDT)
- Do you have any better shots of it? --Funkychinaman (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2014 (EDT)